In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of large shopping malls and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of going shopping is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that local shops can be a plus, and I will examine that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, small shopping malls can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that going grocery shopping, as well as buying goods, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of shopping malls. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and using local shops apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the small local shops might increase the consequences of modern cities. Moreover, unique aspects of developing shops relate to this reality that the demerits of different products pertain to replacing local shops. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of small supermarkets is correlated negatively with different services. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of modern towns.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the large shopping mall far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of going to local shops prove the significance of customers, but also pinpoint shoppers implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50972762646 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06619723834 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634241245136 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1308042172 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342480537988 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115637156954 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633966730785 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195957218885 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188854579303 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.