Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, air travel has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question "is air travel proper for affluent people?" Although some individuals argue that ordinary man cannot take advantage of the air travel, I tend to believe that both the low- income and wealthy humans benefit from the airplane.
From an environmental point of view, air travel is indeed bound up tightly with affluent people, which means it might lead to both middle -class man and rich individuals. For example, a group of reputable economists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between air pollution and offering economy class tickets as well as fossil fuels. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that travelling by plane is correlated positively with not only people from all walks of life but also environmental issues.
In economic terms, the development of air travel is undoubtedly attributable to earnings of citizens, in that it would lead to the swift way, the saving time, and earning money. A well-known example of such attributions is low price tickets, which are cause for concern since they had been mistaken to take affordable tickets for granted. Had they provided international passengers in advance, it might have had the opportunity to save money. Thus, travelling by plane could play a significant role in providing convenience.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that poor and high-income men could take advantage of air traveling. However, as every garden may have some weeds, local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Nowadays, air travel has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41240875912 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04153892433 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649635036496 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0525815679 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.3 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238367377132 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801898969179 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782268097098 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136469947377 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851756746396 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.94827586207 196% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.