Over the past few years, there has been a high degree of ambivalence over this matter, whether travel is really necessary for studies. whereas, some people say that it is overrated, as there have been good scholars who studied locally. I sanguinely believe that travel to study gives move exposure. This essay will further discuss the reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that travel provides the local experience, which is hard to gain locally. According to my own experience, when I was a university student. I conducted research on this topic. The research proved that the student who travelled to study had a better knowledge of the area than the one studied locally. Thus, the beneficial ramification of the travel to study apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, some sceptics conjecture that travelling to study is over-rated and expensive. Nowadays, with the pace of technologies, education institutions have also modernized their education systems. Which makes it's possible to interact with the foreign students remotely. Although it seems ostensibly veridical but does not provide the same level of exposure as travelling. As a tangible example, research conducted by a reputed organization revealed that student who studies in foreign universities are more confident than the one studied locally. Hence, this is correct to presume a preconceived notion of the sceptics.
To conclude, where there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that travel to study for tertiary studies far outrights its drawbacks. Not only do the benefits of foreign education proves its significance, but also pinpoints the differences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...travel is really necessary for studies. whereas, some people say that it is overrated, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lso modernized their education systems. Which makes its possible to interact with the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, really, so, then, thus, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33916083916 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89666903121 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2265212314 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8235294118 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42615656783 0.242375264174 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126035502228 0.0925447433944 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126666943028 0.071462118173 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256376797458 0.151781067708 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447891786232 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.