Studying works of literature of a hundred years ago is a waste of time for students in today. Agree or disagree, give your reason and example.
recently the phenomenon of studying literature and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of wasting time is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that literature studying for new students can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, the history and literature courses can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that understanding historical events as well as being helpful for future decision-makings. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the ancestors' lessons. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both literature learning and the theoretical knowledge apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, recent schools' curriculum might increase the consequences of illiteracy. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of making mistakes relate to this reality that the demerits of neglecting literature studying pertain to disappointment results. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of ignoring works of literature are correlated negatively with a wasting of time. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the necessity of all university courses.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of teaching literature far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being aware of historical events prove the significance of studying literature, but also pinpoint the saving time implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recently
recently the phenomenon of studying literature a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
... Within the realm of education, recent schools curriculum might increase the consequen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81954887218 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31187431892 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8650501345 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194001398578 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614269289993 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048460187206 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108764649903 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042277042052 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.