Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of role models and its corresponding impacts has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that movie stars might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that sports stars can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, role models can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that being successful and famous are inextricably bound up. Regarding personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered youngsters are affected by superstars. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both being glamorous and luxury distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of sports science, without the slightest doubt, role models might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of an expensive life. Moreover, fundamental aspects of well-known people relate to this reality that the demerits of lifestyle pertain to working hard. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downside of pursuing models were correlated positively with being wealthy, the local authorities would ultimately address celebrities. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of supermodels.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of models for youngsters far outweigh its downsides. Not only do the virtues of living a fancy life prove the significance of money, but also pinpoint sports implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d its corresponding impacts has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72200772201 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18221211806 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667953667954 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0539731467 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205181385594 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585523878807 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424107341902 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106889072224 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352313954597 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.