Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of the role modeling of successful sports and glamorous film stars for youngsters and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the copying of the role model of sports and glamorous stars for children is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. I inclined to believe that the copying of persons’ stars can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From sociologist standpoint, the copying of positive special persons’ role can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that culture, as well as the mind of youngsters, are inextricably bound up, According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the role of special persons such as sports stars. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the good manners of special persons and the style of star persons apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of sociology, the copying of bad behaviors of star persons might increase the consequences of negative on youngsters. Moreover, fundamental aspects of role model for youngsters related to this reality that the demerits of the growth of children pertain to violent. As tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of practical experiences is correlated negatively with different culture. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of parents’ perspective.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the role modeling of successful star persons far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the copying of role modeling prove the significance of the growth of youngsters, but also pinpoint the active society implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 302.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49337748344 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19206843721 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55298013245 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3466086076 50.4703680194 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.818181818 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35550961212 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131526259729 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111475434745 0.071462118173 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216437528124 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115240131 0.0609392437508 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.