Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the learning foreign language of children and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that another language for children is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I inclined to believe that bilingual for children can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From linguistic standpoint, the learning another language for children can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the improving knowledge, as well as globalization, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered practical experiments. Thus the beneficial ramifications bilingual for children and children’s knowledge apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of sociology, the learning of another language might increase the consequences of bilingual. Moreover, fundamental aspects of N related to this reality that the demerits of children’s physical activities pertain to culture. As tangible example, a research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a new language is correlated negatively with children’s entertainments. It is correct to presume the preconceived notion of old the education of system.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the learning of new language for children far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of bilingual prove the significance of the improving of children’s knowledge, but also pinpoint science implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...which discovered practical experiments. Thus the beneficial ramifications bilingual ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84496124031 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48811368552 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600775193798 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0009920518 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217468705183 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774314404532 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047629979974 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134131892748 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293900610681 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.