If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the studying of global warming is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I inclined to believe that the discussing of global warming can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From globalist standpoint, global warming can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the emission of gases, as well as the raising of globe’s temperature, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the effects of temperature’s changes. Thus, the demerits of ramifications of both the melting of globe’s ice and the raising of temperature apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the science of climate, the burning of fossil fuels might increase the consequences of climate changes. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the raising of globe’s temperature related to this reality that the demerits of CO pertain to developed countries such as USA and China. As tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of practical experiences is correlated negatively with globalization. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the situation of developed countries.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on the subject of climate change, I profoundly believe that the benefits of discussing of global warming outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the topic of global warming prove the significance of improving the people’s cognitive, but also pinpoint the effects of climate changes implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61188811189 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34783408428 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58041958042 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1423681691 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0772233271392 0.242375264174 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270634243575 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263102734923 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0469568470817 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258720279648 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.