Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)
Choosing professional sport and film stars as a role model has become a controversial issue among the public all around the world. Although this topic regarded by a considerable number of inhabitants particularly the youths as thoroughly both constructive and positive, others hold opponents view. I am inclined to profoundly believe that it is quite detrimental as it could develop negative aspects for its adherents.
There are several reasons why accepting the well-known dwellers such as celebrities as role models are disadvantageous. First and foremost, most of these settlers are quite different from their roles in movies or the images that they show on TV or other visible schemes. Although the young generation just sees a glamorous side of their lives, some of them have a plethora of difficulties and confrontations in their own lives. According to a new research which was conducted by Tehran University about the eminent's attitudes, some of them are really inappropriate to play as a role model. For instance, they can expand the culture of smoking and increase the tendency of drug consumption.
On the one hand, there is no doubt if these special citizens behave in appropriate styles, they will have some beneficial effects on the adolescents' mind. Namely, by participating in the social and educational events, they can enhance the motivation in juveniles to attend in positive activities in order to either help or guide others. In this way, not only do they have some brilliant effects on the society but also these activities can develop awareness and instruct children.
In conclusion, while choosing the sport or film stars as role models by the young people has some benefits, I strongly believe that its drawbacks outweigh the merits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20701754386 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9884274588 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624561403509 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.9218176029 50.4703680194 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190438431573 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647089020467 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795390966665 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124221872876 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765359621474 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.