Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behaviour. If sporting events cause antisocial behaviour, can team sports really be good for us?
Physical activity has become an essential part of all the humans to survive with good health and spririt. Sports is one such activity which enhances the social behavior along with maintaining a balanced body condition. But some sporting events are often accompanied with rivals between the teams which creates a lot of problems in social behaviour of a sporting person. But, the advantages of involving in such activities always overweight the disadvantages. My opinion is, team sports always is good for us and the reasons and examples are explained in detail as follows.
Firstly, playing the game with different persons in a group helps in understanding each character of individuals in a better way rather than any other activities. Secondly, it enhances the spirits of doing the task as a team which helps in understanding the strengths and weakness of the fellow players and hence can be played with them by applying a stratergy rather than a fight.
In addition, the success and failure of a game teaches a person a lot of things which is really helpful to cope with the real life situations. On top of that, the team sporting helps in grooming a personality and attitude of us along with grooming the body and health overall.
By considering all the above points, the gaming events always enhances the growth of an individual. It is always an individual responsibility. Hence my opinion is always, the positives are always more than its negatives
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...is always an individual responsibility. Hence my opinion is always, the positives are...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, in addition, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8582708834 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553278688525 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5354261876 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173551715577 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661800090357 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977781587428 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905684036376 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865939654514 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.