Technological access to online music and the like should be paid or free. What do you think?
In recent years, due to advancement in technology, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the value of online music in terms of money. There are academics who believe that artists pour their heart and soul in creating the music and hence should not be available at free of cost. However, rest advocates otherwise. In this essay, I shall elaborate both the sides of the arguments and derive the plausible conclusion.
Firstly, there are many arguments which could be attributed towards making the music available online for free. The most conspicuous one is that artists already receive the hefty amount in the form of royalties, live concerts, selling merchandises, and licensing fees for their music albums. Not only free access to online music would proffer the general public to have the golden opportunity to listen to their all-time favorite music at any given point of time but it will also succor the artist to be famous at no extra cost and efforts to put into it. Moreover, newcomers can learn from the eminent singers’ uploaded music videos and sharpen their artistic skills.
On the flip side, critics argue that anything accessible at free loses its value and thus, they put forward their concern that if the music is available at free of charge, would be taken for granted. Moreover, artists create music by putting their tremendous money, meticulous efforts with the aim to earn from it and not it as a hobby. Thus, they would expect to make huge profits like other business tycoons do and its quite fair to do so.
To recapitulate, form the above-mentioned arguments, it can be concluded that benefits of making free music available online are too great to ignore. However, joint efforts from government and artist should be made to secure the revenue of the artists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ccess to online music would proffer the general public to have the golden opportunity to liste...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 308.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95779220779 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56641211786 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587662337662 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0604526838 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.461538462 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261565449138 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893819491038 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611951512498 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166337077257 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168097576053 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.