Technology access to online music and the like should be free or paid.

Essay topics:

Technology access to online music and the like should be free or paid.

The issue which frequently generates a great deal of heated debate is technology access to online music and the like should be free or paid and the problem is certainly discussed in contemporary world. Many academics contend that technology access to online free music. this essay will express the complete agreement with this notion and will express my viewpoint.

To commence with, there are a wide range of argument to support the aforementioned statement. However, the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that it is not remote or complicated but accessible and pragmatic. it has long been considered perfectly justified by proponents to assume that online music is very beneficial for music lovers. Furthermore, it is asserted that people can listen to the music everywhere and anytime in their phone with just one tap. A classic example of this occurring is statistics revealed by UN. it clearly demonstrates that sixty nations worldwide prefer to follow this trend.

Another convincing fact to ascertain this is people can listen to the music while doing their work. Besides, it seems incontrovertible that people does not need to carry radio as well as more sources to listen music. A relevant example is nations world over have observed a dramatic shift in the opinion of public regarding this issue.

In the view of argument discussed above, it is my considered opinion that advantages overweight the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...technology access to online free music. this essay will express the complete agreeme...
^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...mplicated but accessible and pragmatic. it has long been considered perfectly just...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18965517241 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87646979438 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599137931034 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.997937895 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6153846154 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315002361686 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983167794153 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162364354033 0.071462118173 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161551541515 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190050434947 0.0609392437508 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.