Recently, the phenomenon of TV and its fruitful functions in individuals' lives has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question ''Does television have positive functions to play in people's lives in order to relax them and be a good friend?'' Whereas it is a widely held view that TV plays a crucial role in everyone's life and is a loyal companion, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the hobby standpoint, relaxed people are bound up inextricably with TV programs, which indicate they lead to both fun TV shows and good indoor leisure activity. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2015 demonstrates the relationship between TV series and individual's relaxation as well as an exponential increase in the number of couch potatoes. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of television is correlated positively with not only more relaxed viewers but also being a good companion for family members.
Within the realm of television-related impacts, without the slightest doubt, being a good companion for family members attribute to more relaxed viewers, in that it would come down to relaxation, leisure activities, and effective TV programs. A salient example of such attribution is late night shows, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take TV for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint TV-related problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of TV programs in individuals' entertainment.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes ''all's well that ends well,'' after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that TV plays a crucial role in everyone's life and is a loyal companion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23154362416 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12304350718 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624161073826 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8970855328 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.9 104.977214359 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 20.9669160288 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174170209987 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067485894019 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536340907736 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109346042167 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277476038348 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.