Recently, the phenomenon of older people increasing population and its substantial impacts on society has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question ''Does the trend of older people constant increasing have a positive or negative influence on the society?'' Whereas it is a widely held view that the constant elderly people population growth is negatively affecting the society, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, technological development is bound up inextricably with a young population, which indicates they lead to both positive effects and sociological progressions. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2015 demonstrates the relationship between the aging population growth and social crisis as well as an exponential increase in the number of retired workforce. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of old society is correlated positively with not only less technological development but also pension payment crisis.
Within the realm of the aging population, without the slightest doubt, pension payment crisis attribute to less technological development, in that it would come down to steady growth of aged population, less young technicians, and high pension payments for the retired people. A salient example of such attribution is Russian aging population, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take young society for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint aging population problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of constant aging population growth in weakening society.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes ''all's well that ends well,'' after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the constant elderly people population growth is negatively affecting the society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69666666667 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13838422688 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2696254571 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.9 104.977214359 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.9669160288 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163123471124 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618970401637 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830513274402 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105060079514 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103816675032 0.0609392437508 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 12.6369458128 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.