Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading
The substantial influences of TV roles have sparked a controversy amongst the public all around the globe. Although specific arguments claimed that broadcasting information such as breaking news and hard-talk is more important, a group of intellectuals debate otherwise and hold an opponent's view. I am highly inclined to believe that entertainment programs are more vital than the news programs. The agenda of this article is to explain both sides and will lead to a legitimate conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why daily news programs are supported, but the most remarkable one lies in the fact that informational TV plans are supported by many people. An outcome of a recent study, conducted by a renowned university shows that the advertising time between morning news programs is 87% more expensive than the Good Morning America. Hence, it is obvious that the TV media as a broadcasting news are heavily correlated with, social networking, advertising revenue, advertising psychology, reporters communities, on the scene live-report shows, as well as social knowledge about government policy.
Contrary to popular belief, there remain drawbacks clouded up the potential influence of hourly-news shows from BBC and CNN, but the most alarming one rooted in the fact that news agencies often broadcast fake news. For example, when I was a child I found two single-source of truth from TV and local newspaper. Moreover, entertainment programs such as live sports, live music festivals, documentary, as well as romance serials could gather more viewers than Bloomberg program about fuel and stock exchange market index price. So, the importance of entertainment TV programs on cinema, serial revenue and sports-news can be seen with clarity.
To recapitulate, while there are several divergent opinions on both sides, my sentiment is entertainment news gives more credence than informative news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s more credence than informative news.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47315436242 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05251839707 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640939597315 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5214025254 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.916666667 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121183416834 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480772570569 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220063904098 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776827390909 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278635209137 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.