There are more negative impacts than the benefits of people using mobile devices. Do you agree?
Recently, the phenomenon of using mobile phones by people and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although a substantial number of individuals think that people get addicted to the cellphone, I am inclined to believe that utilizing it as a source of information can be a plus. So, I will analyze both views throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, using cell phones can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of easy communication, as well as accessing to high-speed internet, are inextricably bound up. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both rapid contact and accessing a wide range of information apparently can be seen. According to my own experience, since I bought my smartphone, I can easily read the latest news, search for my favorite articles without sitting in front of computers, and talk with others in every situation and location.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, the constant use of mobile phones might increase the consequences of health and mental problems such as obesity, depression, and anxiety. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of mobile addiction could relate to this reality that demerits of high dependency on cell phones pertain to nomophobia (mobile phone addiction). As a tangible example, new research undertaken by UCLA University has asserted that more than 68% of people are addicted to mobile phones. This finding also shows distraction by smartphones is the main reason for car accidents.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of making use of mobile phones far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of searching required information on the net prove the significance of untroubled accessible sources, but also pinpoint easy and inexpensive communication implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-24 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2020-09-07 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- People dispute travel is or is not a component of quality education Some believe travel is overrated What is your opinion 77
- Do you agree that privatization of public sector undertakings is beneficial to society 68
- More and more women are raising a family with a career Please give your opinions on a personal level and a national level 81
- There are more negative impacts than the benefits of people using mobile devices Do you agree 88
- Pop music should have a university degree Do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3569023569 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06586688059 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639730639731 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9058977595 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178866933691 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609775848627 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668646988632 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102119080688 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516401943193 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3569023569 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06586688059 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639730639731 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9058977595 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178866933691 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609775848627 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668646988632 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102119080688 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516401943193 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.