The effect of the time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial change in professional job market has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the time which have employees for personal entertainment in recent years. It can be agreed that the lack of time to share with family due to extend working hours in jobs has some negative impacts. This essay will elaborate how spending more time on working has widespread as a problem and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why people are more focused on working than sharing time with family members, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that competitive companies require more time from their employees in order to be more successful. For instance, long working hours are needed to achieve sale goals which means sometimes workers need to work in weekends.Work results, therefore, can play a vital role to decrease time shared with relatives.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that quality lifestyle requires a lot of money. As an illustration, people hardly work in order to gain more income, overworking more than usual because they need to give money for house responsibilities. Gaining more money for more worked hours, hence, can play a vital role to have a quality lifestyle .
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of spending more time on working instead of sharing personal life time with family members is prominent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Work
...etimes workers need to work in weekends.Work results, therefore, can play a vital ro...
^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...a vital role to have a quality lifestyle . From what has been discussed above, ...
^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
... on working instead of sharing personal life time with family members is prominent.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05970149254 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73691295077 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574626865672 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2362671209 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.6 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341730281067 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15258937296 0.0925447433944 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123022391749 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22068119874 0.151781067708 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167458516337 0.0609392437508 275% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.