The importance of personal finance lectures at college, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of lessons on principles of investing and debt have sparked the controversy over the potential influence of this trend on young people in recent years. It can be agreed that giving classes related to financial concepts has some positive impacts. This essay will elaborate how giving to young people basic financial curses are beneficial for them and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At out the outset, there are numerous reasons why teenagers should receive lessons of personal finance, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that if they learn the importance of saving and investing in high school, it will encourage them to start use wisely loans and credits cards. For instance, teenagers who want to get in to university apply for loans without knowing the financial consequences of interests and fees, therefore, after finishing their degrees they have to pay unreasonable credits leading to possible bankrupts. Previous knowledge about banking loans, therefore, can be beneficial for university students.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that teenagers who learn personal finance and economics principles early have the most time to apply what they know, getting the most out of their knowledge. As an illustration, students who started the habit of creating monthly budget for their money from what they had learnt from financial literacy, they are financial able to own a car paid for themselves. Financial and economic literary, hence, can play a vital role for develop better habits to manage personal budgets.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of principles of finance are prominent for teenagers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36206896552 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77578496359 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593103448276 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.5400569954 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.363636364 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177528311516 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064357195702 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579081130355 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10221651766 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233758945898 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.