Tobacco usage should be regulated by Government or no?
Tobacco is one of the largest used drugs around the globe mainly in the form of cigarettes. The adverse effects of smoking are not confined only to the users, but also impacts passive smokers. This has created a burden on the community welfare cost, such as increased health care cost and decrease in the level of productivity by such people. Some opine, such choices must be at the disposal of an individual, whereas others feel Government needs to regulate these choices to protect the citizens. As per my opinion, though individual choices cannot be regulated, Government can intervene by levying heavy taxes and creating awareness among the masses.
People are the backbone of a nation’s development. If the citizens are healthier, they can contribute better towards the country’s GDP growth and development. However, few of the harmful effects of smoking is reduction in the productivity and life expectancy index, thereby impacting the country’s growth. It is imperative, Government creates an awareness of such harmful effects at a young age, schools and colleges can create an environment where children are not victimized due to lack of awareness.
Secondly, Government can impose heavy taxes or duties making it costlier. Authorities can regulate the import of cigarettes by keeping a ceiling on such import items. This will reduce the purchasing power of an individual. Smoking is a form of an addiction. To overcome it, rehabilitation centers or various methods to control addiction should be made known to the people.
While the choice of smoking remains with the user, Government can play a pivotal role in controlling the supply of such items in the market to protect the citizens of its nation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35144927536 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20667321349 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4853895659 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4666666667 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146352137116 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415298889927 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456985984947 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844233051503 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513236607571 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.