In today’s world, many people use mobile phones and the internet to communication with others. This has resulted in the use of new words and different forms of spelling and grammar. Why do you think these change have happened? Are they positive or nega

Time spine and with every spine there is a change. Ever since mobile phones came into existence in the 20th century there has been immersed changes in the way people communicate with mobile phones and the internet. The following easy will discuss the advantages and disadvantages and reach a conclusion.
Lets start by discussing the benefit of mobile phone and internet for communication. Advance tools such as Facebook, twitter, Instagram and yahoo helps to share information that is found in local newspaper. This has resulted in people no longer have the needs to purchased news pepper. This has help to save costs in the printing industries and in each individual reading the news from their phones or computer.
However, this way of sharing information has affected people's vocabulary. People no longer type long sentences but uses abbreviation for spelling as a result of limited word count that mobile phone has to offer. Beside, many people want to avoid paying for two or three pages of sending messages, reducing the spelling of long words seems to be the best ideal for them.
To conclude although, mobile phone is highly beneficial but we must be prudent to strike a balance, logical and rational outcomes towards the same optimal and fruitful effort or utilization of resources.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...disadvantages and reach a conclusion. Lets start by discussing the benefit of mobi...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, as to, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08450704225 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66372250354 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638497652582 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1713418182 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4545454545 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24235015228 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810944822502 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679800980701 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124950619881 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548043494948 0.0609392437508 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.