Tourism in Undeveloped Countries
Recently, the phenomenon of tourism industry and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that this progressing industry is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that visiting different places away from own residence for leisure, relaxation, fun and enjoyment can be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, tourism can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that economic prosperity, as well as social welfare, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered popularizing the country and development of infrastructures like improvements in road connectivity, hospitality services, more airline services transportation facilities and rail networks. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both economic growth and providing jobs such as selling handicrafts and domestic products apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, tourists might increase the consequences of the cultural issues. Moreover, fundamental aspects of exchanging cultural values relate to this reality that the demerits of cultural degradation pertain to cultural shock. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of threading a nation is correlated negatively with some seasonal and unsecure jobs related to tourism. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of development speed.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of higher living standards far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of boosting up the economy prove the significance of increasing foreign exchange earnings, but also pinpoint local business foster fostering implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9186440678 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31842765174 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68813559322 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 379.143842365 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7414616103 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0852954328591 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252475863679 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370323658727 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0410380344209 0.151781067708 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287878165039 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.68 8.32886699507 140% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 55.0591133005 232% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.