One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is that there is a colossal upsurge of replacing small shops by large malls. There is a widespread concern that some people believe large shopping malls are good for shopping in town and cities but proponents are against it. In my opinion, I agree with the statement of replacing large number of local shops by big shopping malls.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that the big malls in cities provide consumers with a wide variety of services under one roof and consume less apace. In fact, not only do this saves the time of going here and there but also is economy for us. For instance, consumers of Sydney, Australia can purchase almost all of their wants under one roof of Westfield mall and save taxi travel cost. Needless to say, all these merits stand for skyscraper shopping malls in good stead, as far as space and travelling distance is considered.
On the other hand, one detrimental aspect of this argument is that it is very expensive to build those tall and big shopping malls, as a result, the products available are expensive too. For instance, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that a branded jacket of Kathmandu is very expensive bought from a Queen Victoria building. Besides, it is very hard to find the product for an illiterate person in malls. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the concept of large shopping centres.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of large shopping centres in cities and towns are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, so, for instance, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72852233677 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4694302495 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54295532646 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6559924516 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323837420535 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127829555414 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123003327111 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212866793769 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172449259074 0.0609392437508 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.5310837438 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.