In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is to replace traditional business by mega malls. There is a widespread debate that this would only lead to myriad of concerns in city life. However, I do not accept this apprehension entirely and explain why in this essay.
There is a deluge of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that if there will be mega malls instead of traditional shops people can have different experience of shopping. Not only can mega malls offer varieties of shops under same roof, but can also give quality time between families and friends. Needless to say, all these merits stand in favour to people as far as shopping and quality time concerned.
Another overt facet of this argument is that by opening such business government can collect ample of taxes and youth will get job. Thanks to this business the collected money can be utilise for the development in communities’ services. Besides, working youth will contribute their effort for their local development. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of replacing small business by big one.
In the view of the argument outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of big shopping malls are too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 1207.87684729 87% => OK
No of words: 212.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93867924528 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71748472141 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599056603774 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 379.143842365 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3588621792 50.4703680194 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.25 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142598463026 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492789579244 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042714999332 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842998717498 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394493873919 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 61.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.