2 Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree

There are two different way to teach one is experience and another is from formal education. And it is suggested that, experience teaching is effective method because it can be understood easily and stay long term in memory, and such practices are limitless in gaining knowledge. Therefore, I do agree in the given statement.

Firstly, experience teaching is not boring as books. Most of the students find difficulties in concentration into the books and they are unable to achieved any information. However, experience teaching has different story because they are easy to understand, it is not bounded by any complex terms and details. Also, it stays long term in mind because it is practical; therefore, students will success in future by experience teaching.

Secondly, experience teaching is limitless. As we all know books as we know are limited in certain topics, but the students can achieve different knowledge from experience which will be helpful for future. For instance, most of the discoveries we not based on book or they were written in books after discovery. Thus, experience teaching helps to discover new inventions.

To conclude, having several benefits as interesting and easy to understand and not bound in limit give experience education upper hand, but we cannot deny the importance of books in our life.

Votes
Average: 9.4 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23720930233 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91159075688 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590697674419 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.825614168 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8333333333 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285027777317 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114528046029 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052271180059 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163698300746 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584367134039 0.0609392437508 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.