traditional learning vs experiential learning
The idea of experiential learning is widely debated, with many people claiming that the benefits it offers are no match for its drawbacks. However, I don’t entirely agree with this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that by learning through experience students can improve their communication skills. Not only can they perform better in their life, but they can also help others in difficult time. Needless to say, all these merits stand students in good stand when it comes to improving their lifestyle.
Another pivoted aspect of this argument is that in experiential they have to cooperate with others, so it helps them to learn how to work in team and group. It is apparent why many are in favour of experiential learning.
In the view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of experiential learning are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 1207.87684729 66% => OK
No of words: 164.0 242.827586207 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89024390244 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.92707691288 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69283094326 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 139.433497537 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621951219512 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 379.143842365 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4919743177 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1111111111 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 7.25397266985 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212596632682 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853073780297 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821070720363 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143551382521 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573521775069 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 55.0591133005 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.