traditional learning vs experiential learning

Experience is the key factor in formal education. One argument is that experimental learning doesn't work well in formal education. Another argument is experimental learning plays a major role in formal education. This essay will discuss why experimental learning can work well in formal education.

Firstly, there are myriad of arguments in favour of experimental learning. To begin with, experimental or practical learning allows students to understand and grasp ideas in a more better manner as compared to conventional learning. As an example, a student will better understand the ideas of physics and mathematics if demonstrated with experimental examples instead of restricting to theoretical knowledge. Hence, experimental learning is evolving and being introduced at a very fast pace to provide students with better clarification.

Moreover, the students will be enthused to learn the subject along with the practicals. If the curriculum is completely based on theory, the student's motivation and enthusiasm towards the subjects will dwindle. According to research conducted by the University of Texas, students are more enthusiastic in subjects where they can practice what they learnt in the theory. Thus, experimental learning can play a crucial role in formal education.

This essay discussed the reasons why experimental learning can work well in formal education. In my opinion, I completely agree with the fact that experimental learning is crucial in formal education as it augments the understanding of the subjects we study.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... argument is that experimental learning doesnt work well in formal education. Another ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ulum is completely based on theory, the students motivation and enthusiasm towards the s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
... education. In my opinion, I completely agree with the fact that experimental learning is crucial in for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 8.36945812808 12% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55092592593 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11653173604 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 139.433497537 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3811914647 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6428571429 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 20.9669160288 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143151980084 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708642855128 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715753156061 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10726124438 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650798776808 0.0609392437508 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.