Recently, the phenomenon of law enforcement has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “can law change human behaviour?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that introducing the law can alter individual’s attitudes, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the ethical and social standpoint, patterns of behaviour are bound up inextricably with social norms, which indicate it might lead to both law-abiding and unlawful activities. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between moral corruption and committing a crime as well as an exponential increase in violent acts. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to rehabilitation, community services, and severe punishments alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of observing the law is correlated positively with not only shaping social conducts but also developing better habits.
Within the realm of legislation, without the slightest doubt, crime prevention attribute to enforcing the law, in that it would come down to the death penalty, harsh sentences, and passing a fine. A salient example of such attribution is juvenile delinquencies, which is a cause for concern since they were mistaken to take legal advice for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to existing rule’s problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to legal responsibilities, state legislatures, and even tough regulations. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of enacting strict laws in altering individual’s traits.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analysing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that law can change human behaviour. Meanwhile, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analysing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1207.87684729 156% => OK
No of words: 319.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90595611285 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48776195382 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 139.433497537 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692789968652 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 379.143842365 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7721028511 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.6 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139997277442 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376941160381 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449546430024 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877374206056 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411265588472 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 55.0591133005 236% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.