In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of underdeveloped countries and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that tourism issues can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, developing countries can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that improving facilities, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of social development and cultural advantages apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the imigartion of developed countries might increase the consequences of tourism managment. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of tourism requirements. Hence, it is correct to preume the preconceived notion of cultural development.
To conlude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of tourism far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the disadvantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues’ potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87610619469 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42100647476 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681415929204 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9166486942 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.727272727 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142110921346 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463075186313 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402842280711 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729027179916 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191769073456 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.