The use of newspaper will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain with reasons and examples.
Nowadays, the importance of reading the newspaper in the future has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the modern world, which leads to a moot question “whether using the newspaper than the other mass communications will be less important or not?”. It is a widely held view that the news coverage of the Internet is more beneficial than the newspaper, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that the Internet plays a vital role than the newspaper. Therefore, I express why I support this idea. First and foremost is that it is easy to access and readers can keep up with the latest news immediately in terms of economics, medical, and politics. Secondly, it can be argued that destruction of the environment for providing the newspaper that leads to deforestation will be diminished. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that the news coverage on the Internet is faster than the newspaper. A group of journalists, working at a prestigious organization conducted that the popularity of the newspaper in modern communities has decreased. The internet is the best substitution than the newspaper.
However, there is no doubt that using newspaper provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that reading newspaper is so convenient for elderly while using the Internet is excessively complicated for them. Moreover, it is quite clear that the news and subject that published in the newspaper are more reliable than the Internet.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that the use of newspaper will be less important in the future. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the newspaper in the future has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 306.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14705882353 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02487480275 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8803344661 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269765881307 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932990699198 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102118886523 0.071462118173 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164641282607 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240008887524 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.