What are the advantage and disadvantage of mass communication in the present modern world?
The importance of mass communication which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This essay will further elaborate both positive effect of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that mass communication very helpful for people. People can gain more knowledge mass communication. Mass communication increased work progress in country and mass communication can save a time people can see the new in mass communication. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that so many things of mass communication. For example television people gain information about history in history channel. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, these are some pitfall that negate these argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that many people can wrong used of mass communication. For example terrorists are wrong used of mass communication he easy boom explode help with mass communication. Besides, many people used mass communication in 24 hours but it is harmful for eyes and health. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of mass communication are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r people. People can gain more knowledge mass communication. Mass communication i...
^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this argument' or 'these arguments'?
Suggestion: this argument; these arguments
...ver, these are some pitfall that negate these argument and which can certainly overwhelm the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35742971888 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06763697437 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542168674699 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7215204095 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163141974054 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660802779213 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633905871276 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105823482842 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384200362676 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.