What are the advantages and disadvantages of mass communication in the present modern world?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in mass communication in the present modern world. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that we can communicate with anyone any part of the world at one click of a button can not only contribute to mass communication in the present modern world but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offer, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, these entire merits stand one is good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of generally we can see that through mass media there is spreading of rumors and fake information. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend, people have not only realized its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions when it comes to today’s ever changing lifestyles. Besides, its impact on mass communication is far reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many are against mass communication in the present modern world.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of mass communication are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'offers'?
Suggestion: offers
...anks to the wide range of advantages it offer, not only can one benefit more when it ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96503496503 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.882493392 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541958041958 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3529762758 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268420125175 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111887327676 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14273449424 0.071462118173 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165690146141 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419861621625 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.