Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use daily produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance. TO what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantage.
Now day’s people use branded things and they also want to eat branded and international products. In earlier time there were not any transportation systems available. Moreover, import and export were also not available. Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use daily produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance. I will discuss both advantages and disadvantage of this statement.
Firstly, when we buy international things we can taste the variety of fruits and vegetables. People can also get a new experience of different eatable products. Moreover people also buy a branded clothes and usable things. They also establishment of different branded showroom like Adidas and Nike. They buy one thing for long time use. At the last employment opportunity increased. For example in India 50% of people use branded clothes and international products and get lots of benefits with this.
Secondly, it has lots of disadvantages when people buy international things it increase the pollution in environment and increase lots of germs in air. On the next step the thing that is import and exports between the nations it’s not good for eatable products. Moreover it also decreases the eroding values of traditional goods in the nations.
To end I think that people should buy cloths and this types of another things and don’t buy eatable products because it is not good for humans life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...perience of different eatable products. Moreover people also buy a branded clothes and u...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...when people buy international things it increase the pollution in environment and increa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...t's not good for eatable products. Moreover it also decreases the eroding values of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because it is not good for humans life.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, another thing, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20085470085 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89249319989 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547008547009 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.988659238 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0625 104.977214359 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.625 20.9669160288 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228944270778 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815202326919 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191519139805 0.071462118173 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147588300923 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150375283986 0.0609392437508 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.9458128079 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.