Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use daily produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance. To what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The importance of global economy which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject of this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my view from favoring both side positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most important one stems for fact is that it is very smooth and soft things and all things are originals. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that it is very comfortable for anyone and also it is very stylish. Needless to say, that all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence is that we pay extra charges for foreign things. Moreover, all things is very expensive and we can’t afford for all. Hence, it is apparent why are many in against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of global economy are instruments indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ins'.
Suggestion: many ins
... for all. Hence, it is apparent why are many in against of this trend. According to t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12556053812 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69932064027 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605381165919 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4012637458 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855944520512 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330370453651 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0194597951242 0.071462118173 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.052781786093 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161842111446 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.