Personal development is the base for professional development. To what extent do you agree
In this developing era everything is very important. Surely, there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed dramatically. A quiet reflection on typical day reveals Pronominal. Topic in the contemporary discussion people have always and complain personal development the base for professional development I will discuss both agree and disagree in this statement.
Firstly, personal development is very important it helps to improve talent and potential of an individual. Professional development is also major thing. Because nowadays people develop their professional thing they invest lots of money in their jobs and also on their body. Moreover in today’s cloths and personal development is first preference. In our society nobody put finger on a person who spends money on their body. After that the people also attacked with their interpersonal skills. People also develop their personality with a book a think that person do not have knowledge people can get knowledge from book. For example in Australia 40% of people get knowledge with the help of books and get success in professional development.
Secondly, the personal development and professional development is good thing but people should do it properly. Moreover it depends on performance. If a person do not do hard work they cannot get development in any field. Moreover when a person does not do anything for their body the society does not accept that person. For example, performance ratings are totally dependent on how well employee performed the job and delivered the product within the deadline.
To conclude, I am agree with this statement I think that personal development is the base for professional development
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...y in their jobs and also on their body. Moreover in today's cloths and personal dev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 430, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... person who spends money on their body. After that the people also attacked with thei...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 549, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...o develop their personality with a book a think that person do not have knowledge peopl...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...thing but people should do it properly. Moreover it depends on performance. If a person ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ly. Moreover it depends on performance. If a person do not do hard work they canno...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ey cannot get development in any field. Moreover when a person does not do anything for ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...within the deadline. To conclude, I am agree with this statement I think that person...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34191176471 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02467639251 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536764705882 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2128097552 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7222222222 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1111111111 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367215660933 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12183781517 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107375321167 0.071462118173 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269457226714 0.151781067708 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755459870441 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.