Government should build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport
Transportation is dwelling nowadays. Government is providing a lots of facilities to public. Also, travelling is becoming more comfortable and easiest. Lifestyle is becoming very fast so government should build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or government should improve the network of public transport. I will discuss plausible and feasible viewpoint of this statement.
Firstly, in today’s era government is providing several benefits to human beings. They are making national highways so that people can easily travel from one place to another. Moreover nowaday’s people do not have much time to wait in traffic. Because they have their busy schedule and they have to reach their destination on time. For example, 60% of people do not get late for their work they always on time because of proper and safe roads. At the last, people can also travel comfortably in these roads because it is very smooth.
Secondly, public transport is very good for people .When people travel with public transport it can reduce the traffic issue because in world now days everyone have their own vehicle which is ultimately increasing pollution level and reducing natural resources. After math, when people travel with public transport it can control pollution. Moreover it decreases the road accidents. On the next it can save the fossil fuels that are reducing day by day. For example, in china more people are using public vehicles as a mode of transportation. Because they feel that public transport is better than other transportation.
To conclude, I think that both are good but in daily routine public transport should be preffered as it is considered to be more ecofriendly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...lling nowadays. Government is providing a lots of facilities to public. Also, travelli...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...asily travel from one place to another. Moreover nowaday's people do not have much ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...public transport is very good for people .When people travel with public transport...
^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
...blic transport is very good for people .When people travel with public transport it ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reducing natural resources. After math, when people travel with public transport...
^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...lic transport it can control pollution. Moreover it decreases the road accidents. On the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...c vehicles as a mode of transportation. Because they feel that public transport is bett...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20879120879 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80430622874 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567765567766 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6282749284 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 104.977214359 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1666666667 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357537047442 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10929395171 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176850291237 0.071462118173 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255495231445 0.151781067708 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.220200774627 0.0609392437508 361% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.94827586207 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.