the role of a library in keeping books in obsolete. So university should use digital media. what is your opinion/
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of believing that library in keeping books is obsolete. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that the role of a library in keeping books in obsolete. So university should use digital media can not only contribute to doing wide range of information from a single source, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields . Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence in concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are favor of a library in keeping books in obsolete.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of a library in keeping books in obsolete are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...umerous other benefits in various fields . Thanks to the wide range of advantages ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84410646388 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82370548609 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54752851711 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3554547078 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.166666667 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210596267974 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846638581686 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109379439002 0.071462118173 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11958661957 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434774613494 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.