Logging of the rain forests is a serious problem and it may have devastating effects on animals & human life.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in logging of the rain forests it may have devastating effects on animal and human life. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The mot preponderant one is that global warming can not only contribute to ecological imbalance in environment but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one is good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of it harming the lifecycle of human and animals and also increase diseases.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the deforestation harms the human life. Moreover, it is not good for environment. People should grow more trees to save of earth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91603053435 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87697153476 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583969465649 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3991334726 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0769230769 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150758764602 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053842803595 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126058346132 0.071462118173 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973382314366 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11034549987 0.0609392437508 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.