What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates?
Recently, the phenomenon of achieving information by students and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of discussing with classmates or asking teachers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the online materials can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, collecting information online can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of googling related topics, as well as using web-blogs' posts, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered online materials are related to the exhaustive data. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both faster search and abundant information apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, discussing with classmates might increase the consequences of the slower conclusion. Moreover, fundamental aspects of speculated theories could relate to this reality that the demerits of less reliable information pertain to discussions. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of aksing teachers is correlated negatively with the lack of self-confidence. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of discussions and questions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of achieving informations online far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of faster results prove the significance of more reliable data, but also pinpoint students' success implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | sadegh shahsavand | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | Arash3agle | 85 | view |
| 2018-07-07 | minapolo | 88 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates? 85
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 80
- Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-useddrugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day.The long term health costs are high-for smokers themselves, and for thewider community in terms of health ca 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...f more reliable data, but also pinpoint students success implications.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76102941176 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28561920755 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643382352941 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.956466245 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290047179339 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845769431128 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461299838458 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154279379817 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046939246103 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.