What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates?
Recently, the phenomenon of the different methods which are using by students to achieve information and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using online materials to get information can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, getting information by asking teachers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, achieving information by using online materials might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of electronic books could relate to this reality that the demerits of learning methods pertain to E-book markets. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of discussing with classmates to achieve information far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78571428571 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2201850625 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9429782574 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264783191488 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791523280057 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849684222779 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138488893012 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039569518257 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.