Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of designing of building and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of architectural designers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that beautiful buildings can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, having a positive impact can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that famous designers, as well as building quickly, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the work atmosphere. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both individuals' life and work hours apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, having a negative impact might increase the consequences of building process. Moreover, fundamental aspects of affecting work relate to this reality that the demerits of n pertain to people's lifestyle. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of different impacts is correlated negatively with high buildings. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of work experience.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that affecting people's life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of workaholic people prove the significance of overtime working, but also pinpoint healthy lifestyle implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... Thus, beneficial ramifications of both individuals life and work hours apparently can be s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...es, I profoundly believe that affecting peoples life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not on...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70247933884 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24221153846 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669421487603 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5199918379 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340575941667 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961328630668 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482055984788 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164649354814 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509206711447 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.