Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books? Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning environment can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general stand point, formal education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of well-rounded education, as well as conventional education, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, theoretical learning might increase the consequences of theoretic knowledge.Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of intellectual development pertain to training courses. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of practical learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rning might increase the consequences of theoretic knowledge.Moreover, fundamenta...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...he consequences of theoretic knowledge.Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical lear...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heoretic knowledge.Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could rela...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00392156863 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45181808015 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674509803922 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3889517156 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.181818182 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136356402814 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431376847018 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494692920312 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711219308635 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392854599704 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.82 11.5310837438 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.53 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.