Whether studying films at schools is as important as studying literature?
Nowadays, the role of pursuing films at school level is widely debated with many academics claiming that studying films has no value in the later lives while others argue that choosing literature is the safest option for students. Although I strongly believe that students should pursue subjects as per their interest, children should choose films over literature as it is more practical. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
First and foremost, studying films involve lots of efforts, time and patience that most students lack. It is well-known that award-winning directors who turned out to be world-renowned have worked hard and succeeded in presenting some good films to the audience. In addition, most parents believe that choosing literature is better than struggling for years to make good films and become successful. Thus, studying literature has significant advantages that cannot be ignored.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks that can overwhelm the potential benefits of choosing literature over films. The most conspicuous one is that studying literature is boring and students may experience early burnout in their career as compared to those who find films as an interesting, entertaining and a diversified career. Furthermore, it is highly likely that youngsters who pursue a career in literature don’t earn handsomely than those who earn a fortune as a film director. Therefore, it is apparent that studying films offer a beneficial platform to young people.
This essay discussed the potential benefits of studying films and the implications of pursuing literature. In my opinion, the merits involved in studying films outweighs the downsides of studying literature at schools.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51470588235 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9479334149 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7073272388 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.384615385 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39675640531 0.242375264174 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149693520383 0.0925447433944 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111468178938 0.071462118173 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267847584458 0.151781067708 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859413296146 0.0609392437508 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.