whether travel is a necessary component of a quality education. discuss and give your own opinion.
The importance of travelling for education quality, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of travelling for education quality has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on students in recent years. It can be agreed that travelling to bigger cities or foreign countries for study has some positive aspects but some people claim that it has some negative effects. This essay will elaborate upon how travel benefits to school, college or universities students and different level of education and lead to a logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are numerous reasons why but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that traveling creates more opportunities, is more significant. Traveling for study can also help to gain global perspective and a strong independence as well as studying in well known college make students capable of getting best jobs all over the world. For Example, international studies have proven that students who travel to study in renowned universities are likely to get better scop than who didn’t travel. Thus, traveling for study can play a vital role for positive aspects, which has been discussed in the body.
On the contrary, some people adopt an opposing view that young youth can do good study without travelling is also significant as there are numerous reasons for that but the most predominate one lies in the fact that personal growth, job opportunities, and technical and nontechnical skills cannot be achievable from home town.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that travelling for study can be more prominent although home town’s benefits should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ties are likely to get better scop than who didn't travel. Thus, traveling for...
^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os;s benefits should not be overlooked.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33823529412 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89245491153 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577205882353 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0543600437 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.2 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100182885586 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488522642163 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0197432403899 0.071462118173 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0630704626207 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241119885512 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.