While artificial intelligence becomes so advanced, people can use computers to translate foreign languages. Do you agree with it? Give examples or your experiences to support.
Recently, the phenomenon of advancing artificial intelligence and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although conteseted by many that the matter of translating foreign languages is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe than translators' career can be plus, and I will analyze that throught this essay.
From a social standpoint, artificial intelligence becoming advanced can provide the society with some noticable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of international languages and overseas visitors are inextricably bound up. Acoording to my own experience, when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment which discovered translating machines. Therefore, beneficial ramifications of translaion policies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, computerized intelligence can increase the consequences of translators unemployment rate. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a reliable translation could to the reality that the demerits of translation errors pertain to translation applications. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of domestic languages, as well as local people are negatively correlated. Hence. it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of ancient languages.
In conclusion, although there are several compelling argument on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of machine intelligence far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of translation issues are important, but also pinpoint translators' confidence implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'translators'' or 'translator's'?
Suggestion: translators'; translator's
... issues are important but also pinpoint translators confidence implications
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94693877551 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42471600527 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661224489796 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6551724138 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 245.0 20.5024630542 1195% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 50.4703680194 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1457.0 104.977214359 1388% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 245.0 20.9669160288 1169% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 90.0 7.25397266985 1241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279421701019 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.279421701019 0.0925447433944 302% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147632205528 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379926290942 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 129.1 12.6369458128 1022% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -202.58 53.1260098522 -381% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.54236453202 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 102.4 10.9458128079 936% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 18.71 11.5310837438 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.23 8.32886699507 267% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 63.0 9.94827586207 633% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 100.0 10.3980295567 962% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 63.0 10.5123152709 599% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.