The world's government and organisations are facing a lot of issues.
The importance of pollution is increasing which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is hazardous while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate the negative effects of this trend and thus ill lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that pollution is increasing day by day and people face many problems in their life. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that pollution is very harmful for people. Hence it is apparent why many are against this trend.
Steps to deal with this problem are many but the most significant ones are not complicated but accessible and practicable. Besides, government should encourage to people to grow more trees which is very helpful for environment. Primarily, the government should ban on industries which are situated in urban areas and also they create harmful impact on human life.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the problem of pollution can be successfully addressed provided that the above stated measures are taken.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...t pollution is very harmful for people. Hence it is apparent why many are against thi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77952571328 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597285067873 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4515847213 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.090909091 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0382492186647 0.242375264174 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0144100385203 0.0925447433944 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238631868301 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0233813882034 0.151781067708 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264675239831 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.