Some believe that because everyone needs a place to live, governments should provide houses for those who are too poor to afford their own. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, it is believed that housing is a fundamental human right, and the impoverished should be provided with a house if they cannot afford one. While this policy may be beneficial to a certain extent, I firmly believe that it should not be implemented since it can lead to unintended consequences.
On the one hand, it may be argued that free housing can create a pathway out of poverty. Much of this comes down to the fact that housing costs are usually one of the largest expenses, leaving poor people with little or no money for educational or employment opportunities. This lack of education and job training often translates to being stuck in the vicious circle of poverty. Thus, when such a heavy financial burden as housing cost is alleviated with the help of the government, more of their funds can be allocated to these purposes, which may contribute to the eradication of impoverishment in the long run.
On the other hand, I am firmly convinced that the arguments for free housing often fail to take into consideration factors that exerts long-term negative impacts. To begin with, it can place a heavy burden on the national budget. The root cause lies in the fact that the establishment and management of such large-scale housing schemes generally require substantial resources, possibly causing a budget deficit. This may force governments to either divert funds from other critical sectors or impose higher taxes on their citizens. Moreover, free housing policies can foster a dependency mindset. When the basic need of housing is covered by the government, people may expect to have others such as education and healthcare state-funded. Consequently, this on-going heavy reliance will erode their motivation to actually seek employment, fulfill personal development and strive for a brighter future.
In conclusion, although free housing programs can be effective as a method to temporarily fight poverty, I would argue that they should not be adopted by the state since they can put enormous pressure on national funds and create an over-dependence among those who are eligible.
- Some believe that because everyone needs a place to live governments should provide houses for those who are too poor to afford their own To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Today many people do not know their neighbors What problem does this cause What can be done about this 78
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... may be beneficial to a certain extent, I firmly believe that it should not be im...
^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... in the long run. On the other hand, I am firmly convinced that the arguments ...
^
Line 5, column 758, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...thcare state-funded. Consequently, this on-going heavy reliance will erode their motivat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... a method to temporarily fight poverty, I would argue that they should not be ado...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12716763006 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9214378351 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1239000335 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152148144541 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528433795848 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350589325653 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962400366441 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339632950729 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.