Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about whether newly erected residential buildings should follow the style of existing ones. While some argue that people should be given the right of building their houses in the style of their choice, I believe that these new houses need to adopt the same style as the old ones.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why some people are in favour of the idea that everyone can build their houses in their own style. They may assert that it is acceptable as long as the construction of these buildings abides by the local construction regulations and is permitted by the authorities. In other words, it is their freedom and personal decisions that should be viewed as important. Additionally, it could be much more economical to construct a modern simple house rather than one that follow the architectural standards of the past.
On the other hand, I believe that newly built residences should be in line with the old ones in terms of their style. Firstly, the similarity in the design of new and old buildings will create an architectural agreement, which can complement the appearance of the local areas. Secondly, the traditional designs of houses in a certain region usually reflect the cultural values of that region. Therefore, it is important to strictly follow these patterns as a way of maintaining traditions. For example, it is compulsory that private houses in the ancient town of Hoi An adhere to the same old construction styles so that the overall architectural structure of the town, for which it is renowned, can be preserved.
To conclude, although it seems that people should be allowed to construct their houses in their own style, I support the idea that the style of new houses need to be the same as that of the ones which were built earlier.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-25 | Phạm Phú Trường | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | Invisible | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | hangduan94@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | n0air9x9 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | n0air9x9 | 89 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Some people say television contributes more than other modern inventions to the quality of life of ordinary people Do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays, the most important task is the protection of the environment for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ivate houses in the ancient town of Hoi An adhere to the same old construction styles so ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8640776699 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70792384717 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478964401294 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.140307967 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459375611242 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170358595367 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111652678101 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316086256905 0.151304729494 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786487949067 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.