Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Thanks to the effects of globalization, the gap between countries has been narrowed and international products have become more easily accessible. Personally, I postulate this trend a positive development.
To begin with, the availability of international products is advantageous for nations as well as their citizens. It enables consumers to purchase quality products regardless of their geographical location. For instance, a person living in Vietnam can easily possess branded devices from Apple or Microsoft, which are both American manufacturers. This can act as a facilitator for bridging the gaps among countries as the economic barrier among nations is one of the fundamental causes of international conflicts. Thus, with the mutual trade agreements reached, countries are now more aware of settling political unrest harmoniously and maintaining world peace.
Furthermore, both international and domestic manufacturers may benefit from this development. Oversea predominant companies can place their outlets and factories in developing countries, which is likely to benefit all the parties involved. The suppliers may experience a boost in sales while their clients can have more and better choices. What is more, local manufacturers are put under the pressure of improving their products in order not to be stamped out of the competition. These companies, therefore, can gain better recognition and become capable of expanding their market to other countries. As an illustration, Thai Duong, a formerly local Vietnamese company specializing in cosmetics and other healthcare products, is now a well-known brand in many parts of the world after its success in renewing its image to compete with manufacturers of the same kinds of products around the world.
To conclude, the fact that foreign products are now widely available has greatly and positively altered the world in terms of international relationships and economic development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72852233677 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26244819343 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7000361038 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.071428571 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195976278962 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652307674594 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418686484779 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128168184084 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429785806288 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.