Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about the protection of wild animals. While some argue that we should only focus on the preservation of certain species, I believe that all wild animals need to be conserved.
On the one hand, many people assert that we should only allocate resources to the conservation of particular breeds. It is true that there are species that should be treated with special care and attention. These are usually endangered ones which are on the verge of extinction. There seem to be a number of factors that put their existence at risk, and poachers generally pose the biggest danger for them. For instance, Java rhinos have completely disappeared after decades of being killed for their horns, which are mistakenly thought to be able to cure terminal diseases. Also, the destruction of their natural habitats, which is the result of our careless industrial and agricultural practices, contributes greatly to the problem. Consequently, these species of animals are disappearing at an alarming rate.
On the other hand, in my view, it is critical that we protect all kinds of wild animals. Firstly, every species plays an irreplaceable role in maintaining the earth’s natural ecosystem. That is to say, they are important for the existence o f one another, and the disappearance of any species would result in a serious imbalance. To give a clear example, the tiger population is likely to decline dramatically if their prey such as zebras or deers vanish. Another reason for my argument is the fact that if we do not pay proper attention to the protection of certain animals, they can be extinct in the future even when there are currently plenty of them. It would be too late to take action when they have already begun to disappear.
In conclusion, although it seems reasonable to only preserve species that are in danger of extinction, I believe that it is much more practical for all wild animals to be protected.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view, it is true, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97239263804 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83486868916 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564417177914 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3414624642 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.3125 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4375 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302583020173 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937592271531 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912519076449 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220295677464 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10494436461 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.