Whether we should save all wild animals or some species is a debating topic nowadays. While many people argue that we should secure all wild creatures, others consider that some rare wild animals should be protected. This essay will discuss why some folks favor guarding few uncommon wild animals but why shielding all wild animals in ultimately superior.
Some people do not support the idea to preserve all wild animals because in their viewpoint overpopulation of wild creatures could turn into a danger to human life. For instance, if we keep all wild animals then their population might become overcrowded, and as a result, they might move towards living areas from the forests, which would be quite alarming. Another reason they give that protecting all wildlife requires a handsome amount of money. According to their point of view that money can be used for humanity, as, human beings are still dying with starvation in many third world countries.
Conversely, there are people who believe to protect all wild animals. They think that all wild animals are part of our ecosystem. If some of these wild animals get extinct then the whole ecosystem would not be balanced. Additionally, wild animals are also beneficial for humans as medical treatments. For example, the blood of the snake can be utilized to cure skin problems. In short, protecting some wild animals may lead to the extinction of others. Clearly, it costs the heterogeneity of the world.
This essay discussed the opposing views of people on guarding wild animals. In my opinion, we should conserve all wild animals because every animal is important to keep the ecosystem balanced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll wild animals in ultimately superior. Some people do not support the idea to p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arvation in many third world countries. Conversely, there are people who believe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...wild animals are part of our ecosystem. If some of these wild animals get extinct ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, may, so, still, then, third, while, for example, for instance, in short, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0989010989 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56375193835 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.882983135 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419593388251 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153334606835 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682231487743 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282456162027 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450642648571 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.